Difference between revisions of "Paris Code Sprint 2016 : Feedback"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Aim is both to provide feedbacks to the sponsors, and to help prepare next editions...
 
Aim is both to provide feedbacks to the sponsors, and to help prepare next editions...
−
 
  
  
Line 13: Line 12:
  
 
Bruno Friedmann - https://lizards.opensuse.org/2016/02/27/tosprint-or-not-to-sprint
 
Bruno Friedmann - https://lizards.opensuse.org/2016/02/27/tosprint-or-not-to-sprint
 +
  
 
== Free Expression ==
 
== Free Expression ==
−
Express in few words, few lines, (or pictures), what this Code Sprint was for you and yours projects.
+
Express in few words, few lines, what this Code Sprint was for you and yours projects.
−
(link to blog or tweets are also fine...)
+
(link to tweets are also fine...)
−
 
 
−
Some pictures are [https://www.flickr.com/groups/osgeo/ here]
 
−
 
 
−
[[User:Lucadelu|Lucadelu]] ([[User talk:Lucadelu|talk]]) 06:57, 26 February 2016 (PST) - Really great organization and amazing coding place! Thanks to sponsor and organizer.
 
−
 
 
−
[[User:Tigerfoot|Tigerfoot]] ([[User talk:Tigerfoot|talk]]) 19:30, 27 February 2016 (PST) - Perfect organization and great place. My report [https://lizards.opensuse.org/2016/02/27/tosprint-or-not-to-sprint/ here]
 
  
 +
Luca Delucchi - Really great organization and amazing coding place! Thanks to sponsor and organizer.
  
 +
Bruno Friedmann - Perfect organization and great place.
  
 
Howard Butler: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000615.html
 
Howard Butler: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000615.html
Line 37: Line 33:
  
 
Stephan  Meißl: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000620.html
 
Stephan  Meißl: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000620.html
 +
 +
  
 
== What should be kept for a next edition ? ==
 
== What should be kept for a next edition ? ==
  
 
== What should be enhanced or at least not been done that way  ? ==
 
== What should be enhanced or at least not been done that way  ? ==

Revision as of 13:59, 2 March 2016

Feedbacks after the Paris Code Sprint 2016 edition.

Aim is both to provide feedbacks to the sponsors, and to help prepare next editions...


Blogs

Victor Poughon - https://www.orfeo-toolbox.org/orfeo-toolbox-team-at-the-osgeo-paris-code-sprint-2016/

Giuseppe Broccolo - http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/brin-postgis-codesprint2016-paris/

Bruno Friedmann - https://lizards.opensuse.org/2016/02/27/tosprint-or-not-to-sprint


Free Expression

Express in few words, few lines, what this Code Sprint was for you and yours projects. (link to tweets are also fine...)

Luca Delucchi - Really great organization and amazing coding place! Thanks to sponsor and organizer.

Bruno Friedmann - Perfect organization and great place.

Howard Butler: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000615.html

Paul Ramsey: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000616.html

Daniel Morissette: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000617.html

Luca Delucchi: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000618.html

Angelos Tsotzos: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000619.html

Stephan Meißl: http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000620.html


What should be kept for a next edition ?

What should be enhanced or at least not been done that way ?