Talk:Service Provider Directory - Revision history

Warmerdam: /* List of Service Types */

2008-02-06T22:54:53Z

List of Service Types

Warmerdam: add links to tickets, and moderation proposal.

2008-02-06T22:53:39Z

add links to tickets, and moderation proposal.

Arnulf: /* Ordering */ more order

2008-01-30T17:51:51Z

Ordering: more order

Arnulf: more feedback

2008-01-30T17:48:29Z

more feedback

Arnulf: New section: Ordering

2008-01-30T17:44:42Z

New section: Ordering

Arnulf: New page: It would be helpful to have options under the 'Technology Expertise' list for 'Geospatial Servers' and 'Systems Administration'. It SEEMS these important services are in keeping with the ...

2008-01-30T17:43:27Z

New page: It would be helpful to have options under the 'Technology Expertise' list for 'Geospatial Servers' and 'Systems Administration'. It SEEMS these important services are in keeping with the ...

New page

It would be helpful to have options under the 'Technology Expertise' list for 'Geospatial Servers' and 'Systems Administration'. It SEEMS these important services are in keeping with the goals of the directory.--[[User:Dougrenwick|Dougrenwick]] 19:27, 28 June 2007 (CEST).
* This should be addressed by the additional section "type of service provided"

* Perhaps a list of service types (e.g. end user application development, by language vs. data development vs. hosting vs. feature development) would help further differentiate providers. ''Change from "perhaps" to "must". I don't want to waste mine or anyone else's time turning down queries I'm not able or willing to provide.''

* Add coordinates to a searchable map. Add colored symbols to represent different service types, size of symbol reflects level of sponsorship or project involvement. This will need to be addressed carefully by good cartographic layout.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:54, 6 February 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	: This is now addressed by the section [[Service Provider Directory#Range of Services \| Range of Services]]		: This is now addressed by the section [[Service Provider Directory#Range of Services \| Range of Services]]
		+
		+	''I feel that service providers can address this in their "landing page", pointed to by their SPD entry in free text they control themselves.'' --[[User:Warmerda\|Warmerda]] 17:54, 6 February 2008 (EST)

	== Coordinates and Map ==		== Coordinates and Map ==

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 == Ordering ==
-Languages should be ordered alphabetically. Ideally using the original language like the OSGeo web site does. --[[User:Arnulf Christl|Seven]] 12:48, 30 January 2008 (EST)
+Languages should be ordered alphabetically. Ideally using the original language like the OSGeo web site does. --[[User:Arnulf Christl|Seven]] 12:48, 30 January 2008 (EST) (http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/200)
 Technologies should also be ordered alphabetically or by the typology used on the OSGeo web site (which gets us into trouble when one project covers more than one typology). --[[User:Arnulf Christl|Seven]] 12:51, 30 January 2008 (EST)
 Maybe a reference link to the corresponding OSGeo project's "credits" page would help to highlight providers that have contributed to the project. Probably also has to be resolved by [[SPD Prioritization]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:51, 30 January 2008
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== Ordering ==		== Ordering ==
	Languages should be ordered alphabetically. Ideally using the original language like the OSGeo web site does. --[[User:Arnulf Christl\|Seven]] 12:48, 30 January 2008 (EST)		Languages should be ordered alphabetically. Ideally using the original language like the OSGeo web site does. --[[User:Arnulf Christl\|Seven]] 12:48, 30 January 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	Technologies should also be ordered alphabetically or by the typology used on the OSGeo web site (which gets us into trouble when one project covers more than one typology). --[[User:Arnulf Christl\|Seven]] 12:51, 30 January 2008 (EST)
		+
		+	Maybe a reference link to the corresponding OSGeo project's "credits" page would help to highlight providers that have contributed to the project. Probably also has to be resolved by [[SPD Prioritization]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 It would be helpful to have options under the 'Technology Expertise' list for 'Geospatial Servers' and 'Systems Administration'.  It SEEMS these important services are in keeping with the goals of the directory.--[[User:Dougrenwick|Dougrenwick]] 19:27, 28 June 2007 (CEST).
-* Perhaps a list of service types (e.g. end user application development, by language vs. data development vs. hosting vs. feature development) would help further differentiate providers. ''Change from "perhaps" to "must". I don't want to waste mine or anyone else's time turning down queries I'm not able or willing to provide.''
+: This is now addressed by the section [[Service Provider Directory#Range of Services | Range of Services]]
-* Add coordinates to a searchable map. Add colored symbols to represent different service types, size of symbol reflects level of sponsorship or project involvement. This will need to be addressed carefully by good cartographic layout.
+== List of Service Types ==
 == Ordering ==
+Languages should be ordered alphabetically. Ideally using the original language like the OSGeo web site does. --[[User:Arnulf Christl|Seven]] 12:48, 30 January 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:44, 30 January 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:

	* Add coordinates to a searchable map. Add colored symbols to represent different service types, size of symbol reflects level of sponsorship or project involvement. This will need to be addressed carefully by good cartographic layout.		* Add coordinates to a searchable map. Add colored symbols to represent different service types, size of symbol reflects level of sponsorship or project involvement. This will need to be addressed carefully by good cartographic layout.
		+
		+	== Ordering ==
		+
		+	Languages should be ordered alphabetically. Ideally using the original language like the OSGeo web site does.