FOSS4G Europe 2015 GeoForAll Agenda - Revision history

Aghisla: /* 3. GeoForAll Europe Meeting */ minutes and attendance

2015-07-17T09:39:02Z

3. GeoForAll Europe Meeting: minutes and attendance

2015-07-16T15:01:37Z

1. GeoForAll pre-conference meeting

2015-07-15T10:19:52Z

3. GeoForAll Europe Meeting

2015-07-14T08:25:46Z

1. GeoForAll pre-conference meeting

2015-07-14T06:42:20Z

2015-07-14T06:31:15Z

2015-07-13T15:38:02Z

1. GeoForAll pre-conference meeting

2015-07-13T15:35:00Z

1. GeoForAll pre-conference meeting

2015-07-13T15:11:13Z

1. GeoForAll pre-conference meeting

2015-07-13T15:10:14Z

1. GeoForAll pre-conference meeting

@@ Line 106: / Line 106: @@
 Where: room 3.5 at Politecnico di Milano
-(This is a good idea... any other regions have a group attending and want
+Agenda:
-Agenda:
+We had an informal discussion about the communication among the Labs. There is general agreement that the European mailing list will be used for the coordination of European-specific projects/funding, while other topics of general interest will be posted to the international list.
-* collaborations between the European and US labs, students exchange and funding opportunities
-Attending? Add your name below.
+Attending:
 * [[User:Aghisla|Anne]], Italy/Germany
 * Ela Wołoszyńska-Wiśniewska, Poland
 * [[User:Darsvid|Daria Svidzinska]], Ukraine
 * [[User:Aperezn|Antoni Perez-Navarro]]
 * Nadia Panchaud, Switzerland
-* Suchith Anand (attending by Skype)
+* Elena Mezzini, Italy
 == 4. GeoForAll Bird's of a Feather 2 ==

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 . '''Certification issues''' (Phil Davis leads) (10:00-10:30)
 * 3a. Phil opens with 5 minute summary/status
-* 3b. Tanzeel Khan presents his findings on 'An OS Certification Model.' 10 minutes
+* 3b. Tanzeel Khan presents his findings on 'An OS Certification Model.' 10 minutes, see [[OSGeo Labs: OSGeo Certification]]
 * 3c. Discussion
 * 3d. summary of key recommendations or action items to report in the BOF 1 on Thursday

@@ Line 125: / Line 125: @@
 * Nadia Panchaud, Switzerland
 * Suchith Anand (attending by Skype)
 * others?

@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 * [[User:Fjbehr|Franz-Josef Behr]]
 * [[User:Aperezn|Antoni Perez-Navarro]]
 * [http://www.linkedin.com/in/ronfortunato Ron Fortunato]
 * Suchith Anand (attending by Skype - sanand1976)

@@ Line 82: / Line 82: @@
 * [http://www.linkedin.com/in/ronfortunato Ron Fortunato]
 * Suchith Anand (attending by Skype - sanand1976)
-* [[User:Mmiler|Mario Miler]]
+* Mario Miler
 * others?

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 - Need scribe volunteer
-. '''GeoForAll lab membership issues''' (Helena leads the discussion here) - 8:45-9:30
+. '''GeoForAll lab membership issues''' (Helena leads the discussion here) - 8:45-9:30 (Ideally faster than this)
 * 2a.Quick update on the current Lab membership list [1] - inactive ones? What do we still need to do to get the list updated?
 * 2b.We want this list to reflect active labs. '''What criteria do we use for lab removal and can this be documented? Annual procedure for keeping this list updated? Can we do this here in Como and get the list updated'''?
@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 . '''OSGeo and GeoForAll educational committee''' -- What is their relationship? Same or different entities? (10:30-10:45)
-* We need to update the OSGeo Education page[8]
+* We need to update the OSGeo Education page [8]. Who would like to help this week?
 . '''Educational content curation strategies''' (Charlie leads) (10:45-11:15)
@@ Line 49: / Line 49: @@
 *b.Antoni - H2020 efforts
 *c.Suchith - AgriGIS?
 .'''Decide on agenda item priorities for BOF 1 report back''' (11:25-11:30)
@@ Line 65: / Line 66: @@
 [7] http://www.oeconsortium.org/

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 * 3b. Tanzeel Khan presents his findings on 'An OS Certification Model.' 10 minutes
 * 3c. Discussion
-* 3d. summary of key decisions or action items
+* 3d. summary of key recommendations or action items to report in the BOF 1 on Thursday
-.'''Educational content curation strategies''' (Charlie leads) (10:30-11:00)
+. '''OSGeo and GeoForAll educational committee''' -- What is their relationship? Same or different entities? (10:30-10:45)
-* summary of key decisions or action items
+* We need to update the OSGeo Education page[8]
-.'''Lightning round update on grant-getting efforts''' (Charlie leads) (11:00-11:20)
+. '''Educational content curation strategies''' (Charlie leads) (10:45-11:15)
 *a.Charlie - NSF RCN
 *b.Antoni - H2020 efforts
 *c.Suchith - AgriGIS?
-.'''Decide on agenda item priorities for BOF 1 report back''' (11:20-11:30)
+.'''Decide on agenda item priorities for BOF 1 report back''' (11:25-11:30)
 [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Edu_current_initiatives#sortable_table_id_0
-[2] http://www.geoforall.org/locations/
+[2] http://www.osgeo.org/educational_content

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 **iv.Discuss the idea of GeoForAll lab membership expansion to K-12 schools.
 **v. Regional mailing lists-keep or delete? There is enough support for keeping them.
-*summary of key decisions or action items
+*summary of key recommendations or action items to report in the BOF 1 on Thursday.
 . '''Certification issues''' (Phil Davis leads) (10:00-10:30)

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 * 2a.Quick update on the current Lab membership list [1] - inactive ones? What do we still need to do to get the list updated?
 * 2b.We want this list to reflect active labs. '''What criteria do we use for lab removal and can this be documented? Annual procedure for keeping this list updated? Can we do this here in Como and get the list updated'''?
-* 2c.Lab membership questions
+* 2c.Lab membership questions (9:30-10:00)
 **i.Our current membership criteria text is here: http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Geoforall_criteria
 **ii.What kind of organization can be called a ‘lab’? Can firms, gov agencies, nonprofits also be ‘Labs’? (based on the discussion so far it appears that YES, ask everybody to put the type of organization into notes)
-**iii.Currently our membership table has some non-universities [1] (based on the discussion so far: keep non-universities as labs if they function according to the criteria, use the new Table "Partners" for organisations wishing to be listed as partners/supporters rather than labs)
+**iii.Currently our membership table has some non-universities [1]. Discuss the issue of firms or agendies as labs or 'partners'.
-**iv.Discuss the idea of GeoForAll lab membership expansion to K-12 schools. (9:30-10:00)
+**iv.Discuss the idea of GeoForAll lab membership expansion to K-12 schools.
 **v. Regional mailing lists-keep or delete? There is enough support for keeping them.
 *summary of key decisions or action items